Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John-William's avatar

I suppose one could call himself/herself a Christian without believing in the fundamental beliefs now associated with Christianity. By that I mean the belief in the basic requirements outlined in the one of the three Ecumenical Creeds that have, over-the-years established the requirements for Christianity. These three are the Athanasian, the Nicene, and the Apostles Creed. But, saying that you are a Christian knowing full-well that you do not agree with the basic standards of Christianity as described in those Creeds is not really being truthful is it?

You may believe in the basic fundamentals of righteous living as taught by the person called Jesus according to the writers in the NT, in that sense I suppose you can call yourself a Christian. After all, you may believe that such a person could have existed in history. But, to be truthful, shouldn’t that require some kind of a “foot note” from you when writing or talking to someone about you being a “Christian”?

In other words, by saying that you are a Christian, it will be assumed that you are a believer in Christianity. However, I should add, that most who say they are Christians do not have a clue as to what is written in these Ecumenical Creeds, nor would most agree 100% with what is actually written in them as their fundamental belief. That is, if they were asked.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts